首页> 外文OA文献 >Microwave Modulation of a Quantum-Well Laser with and without External Optical Injection
【2h】

Microwave Modulation of a Quantum-Well Laser with and without External Optical Injection

机译:带有和不带有外部光注入的量子阱激光器的微波调制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We compare three microwave modulation methods experimentally and theoretically using a semiconductor quantum-well (QW) Fabry–Perot test laser: 1) direct microwave current modulation of the test laser (electrical modulation); 2) optical modulation by an external single-wavelength pump laser with a modulated optical injection power; and 3) electrical modulation of the test laser that is injection locked by an external single-wavelength pump laser with a constant injection power. This is the first direct comparison of the three modulation methods on the same QW laser, to the best of our knowledge. The bandwidth of optical absorption modulation is 7.7 GHz, which is 1.45 times the direct electrical modulation bandwidth (5.3 GHz) at a bias current of 30 mA in the test laser. On the other hand, the electrical modulation of the test laser under injection-locking condition has a significantly higher modulation bandwidth (10.5 GHz) than both the electrical and optical modulation methods.
机译:我们使用半导体量子阱(Fabric-Perot)测试激光器在实验上和理论上比较三种微波调制方法:1)测试激光器的直接微波电流调制(电调制); 2)由外部单波长泵浦激光器以调制的光注入功率进行光调制; 3)对由注入功率恒定的外部单波长泵浦激光器注入锁定的测试激光器进行电调制。据我们所知,这是对同一QW激光器上的三种调制方法的首次直接比较。在测试激光器中,在30 mA的偏置电流下,光吸收调制的带宽为7.7 GHz,是直接电调制带宽(5.3 GHz)的1.45倍。另一方面,在注入锁定条件下,测试激光器的电调制比电和光调制方法都具有明显更高的调制带宽(10.5 GHz)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号